Jump to content

Talk:John D. Rockefeller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJohn D. Rockefeller was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
November 14, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

awards

[edit]

+++I'm interested to know of any awards John D. Rockefeller Sr. received, either during his life or posthumously. Please include on this page if you know of any. If you can provide a link to further related content. Thanks.

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2023

[edit]

At the top section on the second paragraph near the end it says," which was almost 3% of the US GDP of $39.1 billion that year."

I propose that GDP should have (Gross Domestic Product) put next to it and that GDP be made into a link explaining it. 47.226.43.211 (talk) 01:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: I've added the link but not the expansion of the abbreviation, as it interrupts the flow of the lead and it is unlikely that someone will understand what GDP means from the full name if they don't already. Tollens (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Inflation since 1913 to today (March 2024) has accumulated to an over 3000% in devaluation of the dollar. Consequentially a $900 million peak wealth in 1913 would translate to the figure much larger than what is included in the article here. MarkRJeffery (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"con artist"?? Seems extreme

[edit]

The language used to describe William Rockefeller in the "early life" section seems slanted and inflammatory. Can a more neutral reporting be employed instead? 2600:1700:F070:AB10:B872:E3E6:F0A0:F344 (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, William did con others, and we shouldn't sugarcoat that. There's nothing wrong let alone "extreme" with using "con artist" for him as it's quite accurate, not "slanted and inflammatory" at all. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2023

[edit]

John D. Rockefeller also donated to Mount Holyoke College in 1897, and in his honor a dormitory hall was named for him. https://mtholyoke.com/dalbino/rocky1.html

The dormitory had a fire in 1922, and his son John D. Rockefeller Jr. contributed funds to have it rebuilt:https://www.mtholyoke.edu/news/news-stories/fire-fuels-philanthropy 107.15.132.181 (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2024

[edit]

Citation 8 uses the wrong decimal place…should be $28 billion rather than $2.8 billion. 70.54.29.187 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
Urro[talk][edits]13:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024

[edit]

Change the picture description for the picture of Rockefeller shortly after starting standard oil. The description is irrelevant and inappropriate. Pellimisse (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: what makes it irrelevant and inappropriate? M.Bitton (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: no valid explanation given for the proposed deletion. M.Bitton (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • The article has uncited text, including entire paragraphs.
  • The lead is a little long and has citations in it. Is all the information in the lead in the article body? Can this be trimmed to 4 paragraphs?
  • History.com is used twice as a source, but WP:RS/N lists it as unreliable. The information should be cited with another source or removed.

Is anyone willing to address the above, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. charlotte 👸♥ 13:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a lot of uncited text, including entire paragraphs. The lead is a little long, and I think it can be shortened and the references removed (if the information is cited in the article body). History.com is used as a reference which is an unreliable source at WP:RS/P. The "Legacy" section over-relies upon block quotes which creates copyright concerns: this should be summarised in prose. Z1720 (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.