User talk:IMpbt

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar. I've been to Mysore twice, (i have relatives there). How about working to make Mysore a FA? I'll assist you if you're willing. Nichalp 19:05, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

No problems, meanwhile I'll try and push in some more FA's :) in the space of a month. Nichalp 19:21, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Kalimpong

Thanks for copyediting the Kalimpong page. I've listed it as a Featured Article Candidate. You may want to vote... :) =Nichalp (talk · contribs)= 20:14, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

thanks for the barnstar :) Where in Mysore do you live? I was in Mysore for three years. How about helping out a bit with kannada wikipedia whenever possible? I've been editing en wikipedia very less these days.. which is evident by the fact that I checked the talk page today ;) --H P Nadig 01:40, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Lingam

hi Pradeep, I saw your comments on Lingam. There was an elaborate article on this at www.sulekha.com titled "Linga and Cigarette butt" or something of that sort. It was very very informative and presented Indian perspective. Thought of bringing it to your attention. Ramashray 04:49, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw your note on my talk page. Options like protecting the page are used only under extr-ordinary circumstances. It is best to discuss the issue with the users in the talk page and if they don't reply there, they can be contacted in their talk pages. Even then, if they continue to act indifferently, you can request for comment. Also, noone is supposed to revert the same article more than 3 times a day. -- Sundar (talk · contributions) 05:43, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ramshray, It is indeed a very nice article. (When the Cigar becomes a Phallus). Unfortunately, I am going to stop trying to edit the page. The next sections I was going to add were related to Shaivism and explanations of different views. But people seem to be cemented to their views on the subject and not ready to listen or read. Thus, I will only be adding to the mess --IMpbt 16:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Back

Hi. Thanks for your wishes. My reports are now clear and so won't have to take those horrible medicines. Regards, =Nichalp (talk · contribs)= 06:08, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

India geo

Lets try and make teh geography of India a FA by Sunday. I'll take the lead; I'll add text and new right now if you don't mind. I'll keep you posted. Regards, =Nichalp (Talk)= 18:01, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

You can copyedit the sections I've completed till now. If possible please fill in the red links. Would like some information of the extreme temperatures if possible. Regards, =Nichalp (Talk)= 09:26, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Geography page

I've added most of the content on the page. One section is still incomplete. Feel free to add stuff to the page and give it a copyedit. =Nichalp (Talk)= 15:25, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar

Hi,

thanks very much for awarding me a barnstar! Sorry, I had been inactive on Wiki for almost two months now, and only noticed it today.

--ashwatha 01:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Geography is now done

Geography of India is completed; you may want to copyedit the page. Regards, =Nichalp (Talk)= 12:49, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

I didn't quite catch what you were saying on the rivers of India writeup. Previously it was just a list wasn't it? =Nichalp (Talk)= 15:30, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

I have no probs if it can be classifed in a better way as long as it isn't a list of rivers. Just make sure that the watershed paragraph remains. =Nichalp (Talk)= 19:17, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Edit conflict

That explains the duplicate text. I'm done with editing the page for now; please go ahead. =Nichalp (Talk)= 19:56, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Edit conflict

That explains the duplicate text. I'm done with editing the page for now; please go ahead. U can use the {{inuse}} template too. =Nichalp (Talk)= 19:56, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Geography of India

As co-author you may want to vote for the article in FAC. Regards, =Nichalp (Talk)= 08:18, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Straw poll

There is a straw proposal here on my recent rule change: See [1]. Please have a look. =Nichalp (Talk)= 15:26, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Flag of India

The Flag of India is this week's collaboration. Lets all try and make it up to FA status. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:55, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

infobox

Yeah, I was editing. I know the colours for mysore are yucky! See Gangtok. Please don't edit the infoboxes as of now, I'll clean up the mess and keep you informed. Feedback on Gangtok needed. =Nichalp «Talk»= July 3, 2005 12:19 (UTC)

I'm trying to have a colour coded infobox. One colour for states, one for UTs, one for state capital cities, for other cities and finally for districts. =Nichalp «Talk»= July 3, 2005 12:40 (UTC)

Ok, you suggest the colours. see also Surrey. Background images would strain the server. I like the colours BTW. You could also look at wikipedia:infobox for colours already taken. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= July 9, 2005 04:49 (UTC)

Mysore division

Here's a nice map I made.

=Nichalp «Talk»= July 6, 2005 10:31 (UTC)

Looks pretty good. Can you highlight the city ?. I think the division includes other districts (this shows only the mysore district if I recollect correctly.

Colours

Thanks for your message. I didn't spot the message since it was tucked way in an older post. Green is used in the districts: Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian districts. Saffron would be too bright to use. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:26, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

I personally think the colours look good, and goes well with the grey. However if you want to change it just put up the suggested colours on the template's talk and let me know. PS. Please sign your comments so I don't have to check the page history :). =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:15, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Royal titles

Hi. Sorry for the late response. Personally I would like to leave out the longish and non-unique titles like HRH etc However if someone living or dead is well-known with a particular title, we should use that eg the Nawab of Pataudi, Nawab of Arcot etc. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 03:38, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Sure. Go ahead and start a poll. I'llbe online onMonday. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 15:31, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Inactive

Just noticed you moved yoursel to inactive. Will you be gone for long? =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:17, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

I am back part time as of now, hopefully will contribute more.

Janapith Awarded in 1974

Hey it can be noted that D. R. Bendre was awarded with the Janapith in 1974 and not 1964. April 7, 1974 was the date on which the same was declared. "Dattatreya Ramachandra Bendre" a book by G.S.Amur and published by sahitya academy has the info. can Could you please confirm this --Aravind Parvatikar 06:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the 1974 date is correct.

Happy New Year

Wish you a happy and Prosperous New Year

Aravind Parvatikar

ping

Pradeep, can you send across your contact details by mail to me? (send it from my Wikipedia user page). There's gonna be a Kannada Wikipedia meet soon, and I would like you to participate and help out in the arrangements. :-) mail me asap. --H P Nadig * ^{\Talk \Contributions} 21:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Battle Tank

Template:Infobox Battle Tank has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Sherool (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Pradeep, Still missing? We miss your contributions here. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:JNYEL-06.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:JNYEL-06.jpg, which you've sourced to Jim Newton. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello IMpbt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 311 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Lee Giles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SeerSuite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SeerSuite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SeerSuite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 13:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAR of Mysore

I have nominated Mysore for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.-Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 16:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CARTOSAT

A tag has been placed on CARTOSAT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

because the page earlier redirected to Cartosat-1 which is nothing but the 1st satellite of the CARTOSAT Program. It also includes other satellites like Cartosat-2 and Cartosat-3

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jayadevp13 (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now a new page with information has been created.

Regards

Jayadevp13 (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]