This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
True or false: the error of putting dis-ambiguation messages at the top of a page instead of the bottom is primarily done by Wikipedians who fail to take notes on where to put messages. 66.32.252.70 00:22, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
10 minutes are up and no one has answered. 66.32.252.70 00:34, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
15 minutes are up and still no one has answered. 66.32.252.70 00:38, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Yes, in a page like this, the message should be at the bottom. And it should be done using the {{disambig}} template. I have changed it. —Stormie 00:44, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)
But my question is, why do people make the mistake of putting the message at the top?? 66.32.252.70 00:45, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
My guess - because the last disambiguation page that person saw before creating this one had the message at the top. So they copied what they'd just seen, thinking it was correct. I'm sure there are some pages with the message at the top which date back to the days before there was any clear consensus on how to do it. —Stormie 01:44, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)